Possible change for Carlito, Glenn Jacobs photo with Donald Trump
– WWE is considering removing Carlito from The Judgment Day in order to give him a nice singles push.
It was noted that Carlito could find himself falling out of favor with the group over the next few weeks on WWE TV, which would ultimately leading to him getting kicked out of Judgment Day
This would then lead to a big push for him as a singles star in the company as they reportedly feel like he still has a lot of gas left in the tank
Source: WrestleVotes
– Glenn Jacobs posted:
It was great seeing @realDonaldTrump today!
In 18 days, we're going to Make America Great Again! Please do your part and vote Trump/Vance!#MAGA pic.twitter.com/atCJFE7pB3
— Glenn Jacobs (@GlennJacobsTN) October 18, 2024
So, the Big Red R3t@rd wants people to vote for two men who can’t even admit who won & lost 2020?
Wouldn’t surprise me if someone was to look at Jacobs’s record in office so far & find out how horrible he’s been as Mayor, with the people who voted for him being as stupid as he is.
Two absolute legends and patriots in one photo. Sock hydra TDS engaged.
@DB
Here’s the thing. No matter what you’ve been told your entire life and what you keep telling yourself, patriotism is not a good thing. Care to know why?
I think Carlito will end up lost in the shuffle if he’s on his own.
As for the other part of this post, that side sucks, the other side sucks, all politics sucks! Ha, got all of you! You can all be united in your hatred for this non political dude. 😜
@DB
You know, it’s usually the one actually being a sock account that accuses others.
And, from what I remember, it was you/Luke/Joseph that originally made that allegation. So, what does that say about you.
And, the TRUE TDS is Republicans who blindly follow Trump, even at the risk of eventually bringing their own party down when Trump is eventually brought to justice.
@Luke Patriotism is subjective, much characters in pro wrestling. For myself, viewing the landscape in the USA, the patriotic scale starts at the top with Ron Paul and goes all the way down to Barack Obama.
There are many, many republicans and democrats way down at the bottom. Would you agree or disagree with that sentence?
What I find funny about the stance of DB is that, long before Trump got involved in politics, it used to be civil, where Democrats & Republicans could disagree on policy, but still remain friends.
From my perspective, it would seem that history has shown once Republicans decided to attack Democrats as being un-American (despite the kinds of people Republicans embrace, like murderous dictators: Russia’s Putin, North Korea’s Jung-un, etc.), it was Republicans themself that essentially started the political “earthquake” (if you will) that eventually created such political divisiveness that we see today.
@DB
You need to clarify that sentence for me, because I have no idea what you’re trying to say. I was talking about patriotism being inherently defective as a concept, you turned to politicians. It kind of proves my point, but this is not what I was after.
Just to be clear, technically I agree with that sentence, but I really don’t see anything above that bottom. Also, I don’t see how it applies to patriotism.
@WrestleFun
“it was you/Luke/Joseph that originally made that allegation. So, what does that say about you.”
What it says about me (the first person who saw through you) is that I have an analytical mind. What it says about you is that you’re about as dumb as you think you’re smart, because I’m also extremely gullible.
Honestly, it’s ironic that you would make that statement.
But, in the end, despite the facts of the situation, you’ll believe whatever you want.
@Luke
In case you didn’t know, I pointed it out some time ago and dropped it. I think it was the article where you and I had the abortion discussion. So, if you just noticed in the previous article, you weren’t the first. Right now, I personally don’t care if it’s one person pretending to be multiple people or just multiple people. The whole political debate is exhausting. That’s why even though I still read what people are saying, I haven’t really participated much lately.
@Joseph
The first (at least I think it was the first) alter ego was created specifically for me when Fanny couldn’t find any external support and “everyone knows” was starting to sound pretty stupid when no one knew. Baited me in by initially being all nice and friendly (if nothing else, dude truly is a master baiter…), attacked me just like Fanny would, then proceeded to out himself pretty much like Entergate. I didn’t point it out, saw more entertainment value that way. Just noted the obvious alter ego.
And this isn’t political at all. It’s stupid vs. “other”, politics is just a tool. If it were political, I would have gotten an answer to my question about just one successful political system in history under one of the other Trump articles popping up like zits recently instead of “the facts of the situation”…
Wow.
Once again, when they can’t contribute anything meaningful to the discussion, they resort to the BS “alter egos” garbage.
Honestly, I believe I debunked that theory from Joseph once before, making him look stupid. But, then again, of course D. B. Lukoseph is going to reach like that to distract from the fact that they’ve been exposed as sock accounts themselves. They’re unwilling to acknowledge that people like Shhh, Rob Dam Van, and such actually have posted to this site before.
But, whatever; you can tell someone’s losing the fight/debate when they have to resort to finding some way to shine the spotlight on someone else.
So, I guess this means I won…
@Fanny
But of course you won. Just like you’ve “debunked that theory from Joseph once before, making him look stupid”… Would you like a belt? Or do you prefer championship? Maybe we can get Tony Khan to make a quintet or sextet title. He’s gonna want to do an actual tournament, but you won’t have any trouble winning that as well. Right?
By the way, still waiting on that successful political system, you brilliant, infallible (and let us not forget the obvious strong and handsome) master debater you.
Question for anyone else. How do you win when you’re the only one competing?
@Luke (I’m dominating you so thoroughly, “I am your father”)
Insult AEW as much as you like, but all that really proves is that the WWE faithful can’t stand it that their favorite brand is no longer as popular as they still try & claim it is. I mean, I get it that you’ve realized WWE is no longer the dominant powerhouse it was back in the Attitude Era, but to pretty much stoop to acting as smug as AEW fans are accused of being, you might as well just admit, to use an old saying, “you’ve become what you most hate”.
And, after deciding to actually make an attempt at some research, here’s a website article pointing out countries that have had success with democracy; as it turns out, maybe the problem with America has been the Republican Party’s willingness nowadays to embrace the exact opposite of what people saw in the GOP during the days of Kennedy (when it was possible for members of both parties to disagree on politics & policy, but somehow managed to remain friends): https://www.democracymatrix.com/ranking
FYI: The fact of the lengths you’re willing to go to to sarcastically use compliments as insults shows to anyone & everyone your personality trait of lashing out when it’s easy to figure out you’re losing a fight.
I will admit that there are times where frustration may overpower my normally-strong ability to remain civil, but I will always try, in the aftermath, to return to a sense of civility. You, on the other hand… when that frustration hits, it seems like you’d rather let it take over & ride it all the way to the moon (which anyone can tell you never results in a positive outcome). And that is why, in light of your apparent natural ability to deflect & project, you repeatedly return to the same attitude & behavior that everyone by now can see prevents you from improving yourself.
BTW: my comment about winning is more in the sense of winning an argument or debate, which I’m willing to bet most people here would easily admit you’ve been engaging in despite whatever you might believe. And, for you to deny the reality of the situation even more shows to anyone & everyone your way of dealing with the uncomfortable notion of feeling frustrated.
The deep state socialists destroyed the political system in the USA. They want the populace to return to a society of serfdom. The neocons and the democrats are in over their heads now. Now let’s hope for some shoots of liberty to spring from grassroots movements.
@WrestleMyLoveForYouIsLikeATruckBerserker
Love how your attempts at profiling me never fail, how you always pinpoint my flaws and insecurities with such accuracy… Like ridiculing AEW? Must love WWE. Only logical conclusion, no other option. I mean, no way can AEW objectively suck if you like it, right?
But about those successes. Can you actually name some? Because I can rank piles of crap, that won’t necessarily mean that the one at the top will be a gourmet dinner.
Also, it’s kind of funny how the example you provided initially is number 36. But I’m sure you were just joking…
@DB
Yeah, it’s comments like this that make you More on Right to Fanny’s More on Left. Thing is, he’s entertaining. Granted, not by design, but it still counts. You’re not.
@Luke (so much in denial of being dominated by me because “I am your father”)
What I love is your attempt at claiming that, just because you ridicule AEW doesn’t mean you more likely than not tend to lean pro-WWE. For how much I’ve seen wrestling fans on social media commenting on brand supremacy (as it were), I have never seen someone who goes to such great lengths to insult AEW turn out to be anything more than a die-hard, loyal WWE fan.
And, honestly, thank you for pointing out in your comment not only just how much of a blind Trump supporter you really are (will stop at nothing to ignore researched data that disproves your claim), but also just how blindly loyal Trump fans are to his thinking/ideology; by this point in time, he’s practically known for wanting people to think he’s smarter than the experts that have at least tried to keep the boat that is his “administration” from becoming like a sinking Titanic & pretty much causing great harm to this country.
You actually work great as the poster-child for one of Trump’s greatest bragging moments when, back during 2016, Trump himself, at a campaign event, actually literally stated “I love the poorly-educated”. He actually proves the logic that those who vote/support the GOP are those the party has done the most to draw to them due to those kinds of people being gullible enough to believe the absolute provable lies, nonsense, and garbage Republicans have pushed for likely the greater part of their party’s existence.
To sum something up: you wanted examples of successful democracies; apparently, you maybe figured there wouldn’t be any kind of list like that, and that a failure of being able to find researched data that spotlights such successful democracies would then prove your point that such a political system doesn’t work.
I actually managed to find a list of successful democracies that was created through research done by professionals. Therefore, like no other previous instance of you being proven wrong, you were confronted by legitimate, credible information that debunks your plainly-displayed hatred & aversion to politics by the people.
So then, what’s your reaction/response? Much like your “hero”, Trump, you ignore facts & truth, and continue to put forth what, by this point, is now thoroughly-debunked nonsense, while also likely not even paying attention to the notion that anyone who cares to read the newest section of this interaction is likely to come away with the, to a degree, fact-based belief that you, as a symbol of Trump & his supporters, give more than enough reason to not take your politics seriously at all from here on out.