Glenn Jacobs calls for Joe Biden to immediately resign as U.S. president
On Sunday afternoon, United States president Joe Biden announced that he is dropping out of his 2024 bid for re-election. Knox County, TN Mayor Glenn Jacobs aka former WWE star Kane reacted to the news with the following messages via Twitter/X…
“For months, Democrats denied Biden suffered from cognitive decline. Now that they can no longer hide it, they’re kicking him to the curb. But the problems go deeper than one man. It’s doesn’t matter who they run, this country needs Donald Trump back in the White House.”
“If Joe Biden is not fit to run for president, he is not fit to serve as president. He needs to RESIGN NOW!”
If Joe Biden is not fit to run for president, he is not fit to serve as president. He needs to RESIGN NOW!
— Glenn Jacobs (@GlennJacobsTN) July 21, 2024
@Luke
“You have an example of such a person in this very thread. See how he never asks questions when talking about politics? What’s the point? He already knows everything. And facts? Just ignore them. This alone should make you reconsider whether you’re with the right crowd.”
Just one person?
“And no, the other crowd isn’t better or smarter. Just less dangerous. They won’t storm the Capitol when Trump wins.”
Maybe not the capital, but what about the 2016 Portland Oregon riots that damaged a lot of businesses? On YouTube I watched the video “Violent Anti-Trump Protests Try To Steal Spotlight On Inauguration Day | NBC Nightly News” where they showed vehicles on fire and windows smashed. Looks pretty dangerous to me.
@Joseph
No, not just one, but one stands out.
I said “less dangerous”. Fanatics are always dangerous, no matter what or who they represent.
@Luke
I don’t really see the left as being less dangerous. I’m not saying the right isn’t dangerous because they are. But I see it in both sides. Not only that, but it seems to me like neither side can see it in their own side. It’s always the other side that is violent or wrong. I believe that for a lot of people, their identity lies within their political beliefs. So when someone says something they don’t agree with, or they feel something is threatening their belief, they become confrontational and sometimes violent. Not always violent in action, but in words.
@Joseph
Did you actually pay attention to the details of the gun trial you’re referring to?
Yes, in the gun trial, a prosecutor briefly showed the folded laptop to a jury in Delaware, and an FBI agent claimed that the messages & photos on it made Hunter Biden’s drug use clear. However, at no time during the gun trial were the texts and/or messages themselves on the laptop ever actually used as evidence.
So, to a degree, yes, the laptop did make an appearance during Hunter’s gun trial; however, to another degree, no, the laptop itself (as in what’s on its hard drive) was never actually used as evidence.
@Woooo!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGost-Df23w&t=115s&ab_channel=ABCNews
Prosecutors introduce Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop as evidence
“evidence from his laptop and text messages admitting, I’m a liar and a thief, a user and an addict”
The big question remains, why are people still being gas lit by the democrats and their mainstream media lackeys, even after almost five years of excusing Biden’s lack of cognitive ability? That should be the subject at hand. Yet, there are some that know how damning this is, preferring to muddy the waters as a distraction.
My update of an old saying, “Fool me once mainstream media, shame on you. Fool me multiple times, shame on me”. The fools are truly exposed in the comments section here. Thankfully, there are only a few.
@Joseph
So, you missed the part where Hunter states, for the record, he & his legal team will still appeal the conviction?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EovR67mTRt8
Of course you did, because that doesn’t play very well into the Trumper’s narrative about Hunter.
And, when the appellate judge does end up throwing out the conviction based on the laptop because of chain of custody issues, it’s going to be rather amusing watching Trumpers like you stumble & stammer to explain how prosecutors managed to get such faulty evidence allowed in the first place. Or, even when the Supreme Court has to throw the conviction out because even they recognize the laptop is inadmissible because of chain of custody.
The DA that prosecuted Hunter Biden is about to watch their career go up in flames. And, it’s their own fault.
Honestly, it’s very amusing watching DB continue to rant on non-sensically about his garbage ideology.
And, a funny part is now even Fox Noise is turning on Trump, all because he didn’t choose the VP Murdoch said would be better for him.
Turns out, it’s the fool that accuses of others of being such.
And, everyone can see who started that line of thought here. Hint: it wasn’t a Democrat.
@Joseph
The difference is that the right (the dumbest segment of it) is getting riled up by top politicians, including Trump himself. Appealing to the lowest common denominator usually doesn’t end well for anyone else. This is a problem worldwide, not just in the US (see e.g. Russia). By the way, has any presidential candidate ever had such a large part of his own party turn against him?
100% agree about politics shaping people (by the way, I was wrong, two stand out, one on each side, so have fun with that…), one of the reasons I decided get away from them (both politics and people). Haven’t voted since last century. My dream now is to go off grid completely. I really have no idea why you haven’t made the same decision.
Gotta disagree about words though. Words aren’t violent. If they were, you’d have people getting killed by dictionaries. It’s purely your decision how much you let them get to you. And the more you do, the weaker you are.
@Woooo!
No, I didn’t miss that he is going to appeal. Anyone with even half a brain would appeal. Did you even watch the video you clip you linked to? No where in that video did they even mention the laptop and using it as a means of appeal. The guy talked about using the second amendment and the fact that drug users cannot be barred from owning a firearm as grounds for appeal. He said that could be why they appeal. My opinion, that would be a pretty smart move on their part.
You said the laptop can’t be used as evidence. I showed you that it was used. Now you call me a trumper and say I’m going to stumble & stammer to explain how prosecutors managed to get such faulty evidence allowed in the first place because according to you, the laptop was inadmissible because of chain of custody . No. I’m not going to stumble and stammer to explain how they got the laptop into evidence. I don’t care how they got the laptop into evidence and the fact that it was submitted into evidence shows that it was admissible and that there was no problem with the chain of custody.
social media is to blame for the divide because most are to lazy to see if what they are reading or watching is actually true….i call those people MAGA
@Joseph
So then, what are you going to say when either the appellate court or the Supreme Court eventually dismisses Hunter’s gun trial conviction on the charge that the laptop is inadmissible because of chain of custody issues, meaning the DA who prosecuted Hunter with it could likely face the same legal action from Hunter that the DA for Alec Baldwin’s case is facing from Baldwin.
It’s kinda like the situation with Alec Baldwin; how the judge overseeing that case ended up dismissing the trial on the charge that the DA prosecuting the case and Baldwin intentionally withheld pertinent evidence.
So, claim what you want, but the day it’s announced Hunter’s gun trial conviction has been tossed out, whether by the appellate court or the Supreme Court, on the charge that the laptop is inadmissible because of chain of custody issues will prove how much a clown the DA prosecuting the case was, and how much an idiot you are. So, can’t wait for that day, because I can’t wait to hear from you about how it’s possible that the district court got the gun trial conviction so wrong.
Stammer & stumble, my friend. Stammer & stumble. “But, but but….I, I, I…….”
@Woooo!
You’re talking about something that has not happened as if it’s a guarantee outcome. If they appeal and win, great. If they appeal and lose, who cares? Do you honestly think I give a crap about Hunter Biden or this case? I don’t, but you’re obsessed with it. Why? Because he’s a Biden? Because you’re obsessed with Trump? Honestly I could care less. Only reason I posted about the laptop was to show you that it was indeed used as evidence.
@Joseph
You say you could care less, yet you’ve been involved this much in the conversation in this article.
And, in doing gso, you’ve shown you’re obsessed with Biden.
Claim whatever you want, but your actions are speaking louder than your words.
@Joseph
The extreme sycophants, both democrat and republican, that ignore evidence in preference of opinion, twist the procedures of law, and distract by not sticking to the subject, end up ruining the public discourse of debate. They can only react with a binary option, like a toggle switch, on and off. On for their opinion, off when there is opinion and evidence that counteracts their view.
@ the TDS sufferers
Thank you for providing some of the most accurate commentary in supporting Trump Derangement Syndrome as a provable mental issue.
@the Biden Derangement Syndrome sufferers
And, I’d like to thank the right-wing nutjobs for proving some of the most accurate commentary in supporting Biden Derangement Syndrome as a provable mental issue.
@DB
Honestly, I will thoroughly enjoy when Harris defeats Trump and becomes America’s first female President, because I get to see people like you suffer probably one of the worst mental breakdowns society has ever seen. It is people like you who constantly complain about falsely being persecuted for your beliefs that ruin good entertainment for everyone else.
So, continue sticking to the talking points about Hunter Biden up until either an appellate court, or even the Supreme Court, throws out the gun trial and Hunter’s conviction on the charge of the laptop being inadmissible due to chain of custody issues. But, fear not; society will always see you as the hypocritical, projectionist idiots you really are.
@Woooo!
Talking about the laptop doesn’t make a person obsessed with it. Hunter Biden is not Joe Biden. In my opinion, even though there may or may not have been evidence of stuff concerning Joe Biden, the gun case had nothing to do with Joe Biden.
Even talking about politics doesn’t make someone obsessed with it. It’s called having a discussion. I never believed that Trump Derangement Syndrome was really a thing until I started reading your posts. Now I’m a believer.
@Luke
“The difference is that the right (the dumbest segment of it) is getting riled up by top politicians, including Trump himself. Appealing to the lowest common denominator usually doesn’t end well for anyone else.”
I think you could say that about both the right and the left.
“This is a problem worldwide, not just in the US (see e.g. Russia). By the way, has any presidential candidate ever had such a large part of his own party turn against him?”
Vladimir Putin? I don’t know anything about that. I did see that the were conscripting men to fight in Ukraine so my guess is that’s the reason.
“Gotta disagree about words though. Words aren’t violent. If they were, you’d have people getting killed by dictionaries. It’s purely your decision how much you let them get to you. And the more you do, the weaker you are”
Words can be violent in that they can entice violence and violent behavior.
It’s scary that people can be 100% right in what they say about others and at the same time be completely oblivious that it applies to them as well, but it’s still no less hilarious when two such people clash…
Can’t wait for the “discourse” after the elections.
@Joseph
I haven’t heard of Biden trying to incite violence, but I’m open to facts that prove otherwise.
With Russia, I meant historical propaganda, but I forgot you’re an ocean away and our history books are different. We can drop this.
And no, words aren’t violent, they’re just vehicles of communication. If they entice violent behavior, that’s on the listener (who’s stupid and manipulated), not the speaker. The speaker may consciously manipulate the (stupid) listener into violence, but that’s still not a matter of words, it’s a matter of brainwashing. For example, you guys (or most of you) have been manipulated into thinking there is a certain word (you know the one) that can only be used by a certain race. When another race uses it in the presence of that race (even without any malicious intent, like as a quote), it will likely entice violence. But it’s still just a word, still just letters put in a certain order, nothing more. Use it in, say, Albania. No one will give a crap.
@Luke
“I haven’t heard of Biden trying to incite violence, but I’m open to facts that prove otherwise.”
The bullseye comment before Trump was shot. Something Biden even said he now sees as wrong. Saying Trump is going to sacrifice our democracy. Comparing Trump to Hitler. To some followers that’s a call to act.
“And no, words aren’t violent, they’re just vehicles of communication. If they entice violent behavior, that’s on the listener (who’s stupid and manipulated), not the speaker. The speaker may consciously manipulate the (stupid) listener into violence, but that’s still not a matter of words, it’s a matter of brainwashing. ”
I think we’re looking at violence in two different ways. I think you’re talking about actual violence like attacking someone or raping someone. I’m saying that if you don’t do those things, but convince someone else to do those things through your words, you’re just as guilty of being violent. Maxine Waters called on her supporters to publicly confront and harass members of the Trump administration. Now do we blame her followers for doing what she said, her for telling them to do it, or both?
@Joseph
The fact you’re willing to entertain a phrase brought up by someone clearly obsessed enough with the Bidens to have Biden Derangement Syndrome shows that the only ones with “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (a.k.a. totally darn stupid) is people like you & DB. And, you both have shown me that BOTH syndromes are real.
So, sure, claim what you want. But, always remember: your actions will always speak louder than your words.
@Woooo!
I’m sorry, I shouldn’t have said you suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Trump Derangement Syndrome and Biden Derangement Syndrome are not real things.
“your actions will always speak louder than your words.”
What does that even mean? Because I’m involved in a discussion that means I must be obsessed with Biden, Trump, or whatever? You do realize that people can have a discussion without being obsessed about the subject. When someone posts something to me I try to reply back. It’s that simple.
@Joseph
As far as comparing Trump to Hitler, there are plenty of parallels. Stupid hair, for one… And I’d say Hitler did more good for Germans before the war than Trump did for Americans, but I’m not an expert on pre-WWII history, so let’s leave that alone.
We’re talking about the same thing. I have no idea who Maxine Waters is, but if she manipulates people into violence, she’s a piece of crap. However, the fault still ultimately lies with those who allow themselves to be manipulated, they always have a choice. Such people are usually waiting for an excuse, if it wasn’t her, they’d find some other object of cult. I guarantee she wouldn’t get me to do what she said. I’m guessing she wouldn’t have much luck with you either.
@Luke
“she’s a piece of crap. However, the fault still ultimately lies with those who allow themselves to be manipulated, they always have a choice”
I agree that the fault lies with those who commit the acts. But it also lies with the one who got them to commit the acts.
It is a felony under federal law to intentionally “solicit, command, induce, or otherwise endeavor to persuade” another person to engage in a crime of violence against a person or property. 18 U.S.C. § 373.
@Joseph
And yet political and religious leaders have done it for centuries and have largely gone unpunished…
We’re agreeing again, but this still doesn’t turn words into anything more than words. Give me a word that’s inherently evil. Or inherently good for that matter. Just one.
By the way, please don’t bring law into our discussions. You’ve got more than enough people here willing to go down that hole. I’m not. Okay?